The Evo system is more agile but the STI system feels more secure and it is the one I'd prefer driving in Canada winters. While it may be a different story off-road, we find ourselves less at ease through long sweepers due to the constant adjustments being made by the STI's anxious active-center differential. the japanese version of the sti vs evo, the evo uses a bunch of electronics to control its handling, while the … If you’re looking for something that lets the neighbours know your Evo is home before they see you, there are loads of aftermarket exhausts that seal the deal without annoying the entire block; or having them look for the teenagers in a riced-out Civic. The Evo's dynamic characteristics not only make it predictable, but extremely confidence-inspiring, with Bilstein shocks that feel best suited for relatively well-paved roads. But who has that money to throw down for one of those? The seats provide great lateral support but don't share the same level of aggressiveness as the Evo's. http://bit.ly/2mDCQD3 Built Subaru STi vs Built Evo X! from a technical stand point, i feel that the sti has the better drivetrain layout, better weight distribution, and stronger transmission. I had to look up what its name even was when I wrote this. Such a title is probably having you wondering if you clicked on the right review but the facts are here, you cannot honestly consider those 2 vehicules as "sportscars" anymore but rather some "Sports Family Sedans". The WRX uses Subaru’s familiar flat-four engine layout. Discussion Starter • #1 • Oct 6, 2016. Road & Track Performance Car of the Year 2021, PCOTY 2021: How the Track Club Founders Voted, Why the C8 Corvette's Suspension Is So Impressive, The Ferrari 308 GTS Was the Ride of '80s Hollywood, This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. Wants all Evo and STi lovers under one page. It keeps up and even eclipses the extremely well engineered STi’s vehicle control capabilities. ", From the December 2005 issue of Road & Track, "Air to mission control, bogie has been spotted, weapons are hot, awaiting confirmation to engage!". Yet, it does drive well and will easily beat the STI around a track. A ninth-generation Evo preceded an all-new WRX STI, and two diehard factions of fans prayed the cars would trade punches forever. It might not be as aesthetically pleasing, but when it boils down to it, is Subaru making the hatchback anymore? What does it mean to make amends for past mistakes? Making Amends. The Evo has a bonnet scoop, too (in fact, it has two more practical vents on the hood than the STI). I mean, c’mon, Mitsubishi didn’t stop producing the Evo because it was losing to Subaru and the STI. It’s said that the STI is a more practical, friendlier daily driver. The Evo culture here is doing exactly that. The 2015 STI has a bit of improved steering and suspension over previous generations, but any reviews and first-hand experiences say the Evo still feels sharper and grounded while still being light. Look at the picture. Besides, a hatchback is for practicality. The STI might be slightly more predictable to first time drivers of these cars, however, as you can coax the Evo into oversteer in a high speed corner. The addition of a steering-sensor input communicating intentions to the DCCD (Driver Controlled Center Differential) all-wheel-drive system adds intelligence to the STI, with a new mechanical limited-slip center differential helping to transfer torque effectively. Aussies are well familiar with the concept having to choose between red and blue. They both are always splitting power. Or just left? Evo feels faster than the STI. Tell me that this is not a sleeper. Personal preference, but in most professional reviews they say this. As of this year's Super Lap Battle finals and Import Tuner's own STI vs. EVO Shootout at Buttonwillow Raceway in California, and Japan-based Rev Speed magazine's Super Battle at … Both are high on plastic and low on soft touch materials. 5 talking about this. Or, buy the Evo. Anyway, I love subarus and my next car when I am out of college hopefully will be a sti, but I was at the track a couple weeks ago and evo's were beating sti's all day long. One thing remains a given—compare the capabilities of this pair along with their costs, and there simply is no other competition. Yes, Subaru has done well by offering Limited Edition and special occasion STIs. This is not surprising since the Evo and the STI came from driving (very fast) in "poor" driving conditions like rally stages. And if you can buy one, you’re going to be too afraid to drive it hard for fear of it losing value! STi vs. Evo AWD Systems? The Evo is hard on the road, the five-speed box is outdated, and the interior, in typical Evo fashion, is pretty poor. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io, Watch Larry Kosilla Deep-Clean My Disgusting Jeep, Fall Asleep to Eight Hours of Miata Lifter Tick, Learning High-HP Car Control in a McLaren 600LT, This Shop Builds 560-HP 4.5-Liter Cayman GT4s, My Vintage BMW Project Is Already a Nightmare, From R&T Crew: Here's What It's Like to Test Cars. 9 Reasons Why The Subaru Impreza WRX STI Is Better Than The Mitsubishi Lancer Evo. It’s Evo vs STI in one final stoush, but can either compete with the new-age hot hatches from Europe? Let us not forget about those Recaro racing seats that come with the stock Evo. I’ve done multiple 2500-mile road trips in those seats; I know they’re comfortable. Pick an STi if you want to drive fast but do not want to learn how to drive, the car is much more forgiving than the Evo. The STI accomplished an identical mission at 25.6 seconds and an average of 0.73 g -- a very respectable number, but well in the dust of the nimbler Evo. Ever since their induction the STIs have been playing catch-up to the Evo, it’s not a secret. Here is the second side to the story, and obviously the truth... Not so long ago, CT staff writer Darren Cassey wrote something that I, and many of you disagreed with. While neither is particularly comfortable, the 2008-2014 Subaru WRX STI offers one thing the Evo doesn’t: a hatchback b… The new Sti has come very close almost as if they were copying the Evo .The Evo is still a little more focused on what its known for but not by much .As … They’ve branded themselves with their overall looks; they are not hiding behind specific colours. A roof spoiler said to enhance stability graces the top of the rear window, and the underside of the car receives a new diffuser mounted aft of the rear wheels. It is well known that the chassis is more responsive in the Evo, and the S-AWC creates the best possible traction in all scenarios. As of now, the Sti is the more reliable car of the two for people who drive em like they're meant to be driven. It is iconic – I’ll give them that. 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution vs Subaru WRX STI: The Verdict. Hit Likes and invite your friend. The 2.0-liter still feels rather anemic at the low end until muscularity sets in at 3500 rpm, turning it into a rip-roaring, torque-happy beast. The STI, on the other hand, does not dis appoint in that area. Hey everyone, I really didn't know where to put this so i just put it here. Mitsubishi vs Subaru, the improved 2005 Lancer Evolution IX meets the Impreza WRX STi to see which rally legend is the best - WhichCar is the online home of MOTOR magazine. Overall, the Evo is said to be even a step below the STI in this regard. Today, the rally-inspired fight of the early-2000s: Evo vs. STI. But it's not that simple either, as another important ratio to examine is weight to power. The interior of the Subaru is comfortable and well equipped, making it less industrial-like and more inviting. the evo has the better suspension type for the rear, so its less effected by body roll, and its engine is a closed deck type, so its block should take more power. Plus, the Evo has functional fender vents that aid in cooling the brakes and venting air normally trapped in the wheel well, and, of course, add to the rally looks of the car. Turn-in is still quicker than the STI's with a new simple and ergonomic titanium-finished steering wheel to handle. WRX STI Versus EVO X, a match-up between two sporty family sedans. Firstly, it just depends on what you’re planning to do with it. The side skirts add width and make the body flow from front to back, and the spoiler is just big enough without being over-the-top (ahem 2015 STI ahem). Yes that means the STI is the last one standing, but is it the best one left? That mission: to seek and humiliate expensive sports cars that up to this point thought they owned the roads. For our money, it’s the STI and if you don’t like the hatchback look, there is a new sedan coming in 2011. Upgrading to the WRX STI with a 2.5-liter engine would get you 305 horsepower and 290 lb-ft of torque making the STI more comparable to the Lancer Evo in terms of pure performance numbers. Neither of these vehicles is particularly luxurious or comfortable. The competition between the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and the Subaru Impreza WRX STI has been going strong since the early 90s, and recently, we've been adding fuel to that fire. We didn't fret … Don’t lift off the throttle, because you’ll spin. The competitiveness, though, is what has driven the manufacturers to build the best cars possible, and what has pushed them to the top for all of these years. Even if the sti has more hp the evo … I picked up a few new wheelers for my wife and I … Oy vey those are comfortable and snug for tight, fast cornering – even for a woman’s hips! There have been no power changes to the STI's aluminum powerplant, which still boasts an impressive 300 bhp at 6000 rpm with 300 lb.-ft. of torque, more than you ever really need on a daily basis anyway. The STi and EVO are not in the same class, they are AWD and the STi is close to $40,000 with the options that my MS3 has on it. We never seem to tire of that feeling that comes from 20 psi of oxygen-rich thrust, but must admit that for many, it tends to get bothersome in around-town stop-and-go traffic. Go ahead, I dare you. On the other hand, is the smoother, low grumble of the Evo. Well, this is the difficult question. "Looks like we've got ourselves a dogfight! If you’re looking for a car that always sounds like it’s trying to clear its throat, you’ve found the right one in purchasing a STI. Recaro bucket seats, now upholstered in Alcantara to reduce slipperiness, hold you in place under almost all conditions. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR (2014) vs Subaru WRX STI (2015) Advertisement. Subaru has done a great job branding using that paint arrangement. The front lip not only is a functional aid in aerodynamics, it gives the stock Evo the lowered aggressive look. I will admit I grew up wanting the exact iconic colour scheme of gold rims on Subaru Blue. If you buy a stock Evo, you can have the better handling without spending the extra money if you can’t afford it. Throwing these two contenders into a ring together is like throwing the Incredible Hulk in with Juggernaut, and then telling them to have at it for a couple of rounds. The Evo is STI-owner approved. 1) My Evo is a daily driver. The Evo vs. STI battle was a fun one, but does anybody remember the 237 HP Lancer Ralliart? Mitsubishi VS Subaru - EVO VS STI - Who completes the 1000m first? As a road warrior, its sharpness, directness, and aggressive yet forgiving nature leave the STI no choice but to step aside. As the driver you can even see across the hood to the other side of the car – there isn’t anything there to block your view! It’s comfortable for long treks (see my bit about the seats prior) yet track ready when I need it to be. Get Your Merch https://vasyn.com/ Subscribe to my channel for constant uploads! You can’t tell me the STI is more understated. The turbocharged boxer engine in the WRX makes 268 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque. It really depends on what you as a driver want from your car. In a world exclusive, we hijacked the Evolution IX launch to do battle with Subaru’s STi. The experience of piloting one of these tarmac-tearing, dirt-loving predators down a favorable road can often lead one's imagination astray. From the very beginning Mitsubishi and Subaru were battling, producing the Lancer Evolution versus the WRX STI-specific rivalry in 1993. The reason why everyone knows when the STI is coming is because they’re searching for the car that sounds like it is, in a raspy way, rapidly misfiring. Braking systems are identical Brembo setups with nearly equally matched Bridgestone Potenza RE070s (STI) and Yokohama Advan A046s (Evo), which work well for both cars. In my opinion, there is no car that will love you more than an Evo will. The newest STI just looks like an Evo and a Civic SI made a baby. Fact is the Evo's 122 horsepower per liter easily bests the STI's 102 horsepower per liter. Conclusion: The Evo is the Champ. 2) I can fit a rear-facing car seat and a stroller in my car (yes, in the ‘small’ trunk without removing the sound system). This probably depends upon the country, but certainly in the US it feels as though many STI owners around do not understand that the competition between the STI and the Evo is what makes the cars succeed; they tend to be snobby and stick to their own car club. Additionally, neither offers a very nice interior. The noise is better. 30 facts in comparison. Some of the other facets not mentioned yet for the STI include a brand-new front end (think Tribeca) restyled to reflect the company's aircraft heritage. By feel I mean butt test, not time slip wise. What’s a rally car without the rally? But let’s face it, why are you buying this type of car if you aren’t going to drive hard? If you’re looking for a car that always sounds like it’s trying to clear its throat, … Then it truly is a special edition. The article was called 9 Reasons Why The Subaru Impreza WRX STI Is Better Than The Mitsubishi Lancer Evo, and as an Evo owner myself, I had to give my side of the story. And it’s more streamlined. 176 Posts . Then take all of that extra money you didn’t spend on the Limited Edition Subaru and throw it into modding the crap out of your already awesome Evo. Power from the Subaru's larger 2.5-liter turbocharged flat-4 comes in early and seems to stay fairly linear where the Evo's power kicks in abruptly. Not only are they well-matched opponents, but each could also be arguably superior to the other in some way, shape or function. We may earn a commission through links on our site. The STI's overall nature, though still great for track and autocross events, seems to favor a dirtier environment. The Evo IX flexes a MIVEC-equipped (Mitsubishi Innovative Valve timing and Electronic Control) turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-4 now boasting 286 bhp and 289 lb.-ft. of torque. It’s confidence inspiring. The body kit on the Evo X SSS package has it all – it’s sporty, sexy, and sleek. Please confirm you agree to the use of tracking cookies as outlined in the Cookies Policy. We all heard the news that Mitsubishi has discontinued the Evo X. Evo MR updates include a tweaked front fascia integrating foglights with minor changes to head- and taillights, a revised hollow-design carbon-fiber rear wing, body-colored vortex generators, lighter Enkei wheels, and aluminum pedals to match the MR's aluminum roof construction. With their stiff rally car-derived suspensions, both the STI and the Evo offer bone-jarring rides, while their turbocharged 4-cylinder engines are anything but quiet. The torque peak of the Evo occurs at a higher rpm than the STI’s, but the seat of our pants tells us the Evo has more torque at lower rpm. You don’t want the no-name plush seats with somewhat functionality, you want the racing seats. If you care about a special colour scheme, have it custom done. The battle of rally-inspired sports cars continue as Mitsubishi and Subaru go up against each other at the Buttonwillow Raceway in our fourth annual STI vs EVO shootout. For that money you are in the realm of Used BMW M3's and the new Camaro SS (this isn't the same camaro with only straight line power). If you need to haul something bigger than what can fit in the car, buy a truck. The race to one-up each other comes in the form of add-ons instead of overhauls, mainly because Subaru and Mitsubishi know what outstanding performers they already have. What makes a true apology? Gearing is slightly taller and more realistic than that of the STI, leading to less frequent shifting and certainty of which gear to choose when entering a turn. The power improvement comes from a revision of the turbo's compressor housing and a more aggressive muffler, and the power delivery is kept somewhat more linear through variable intake valve timing/phasing. He probably had to replace the entire chassis and suspension to make it a frontrunner. And, although it may surprise you, the majority of STI owners I have spoken with at car meets and competitions admit they wish they had an Evo. The leather-wrapped steering wheel has a better feel, and the gauges are visually more appealing. Yes, the STI has a bonnet scoop. The suspension not only has a longer range of travel, but is better suited for soaking up road irregularities (not to mention landings) than the MR's setup. SAYC, the Evo’s rear torque transferring system/yaw control, is what ultimately makes it victorious in this category. And when the paddle-shifting and extra-beefy suspension of the Evo is considered, the margin of victory starts to look pretty vast for the Evo. When it comes to to the 2011 stock models, the Evo is the clear winner. Subaru producing the STI with no direct competitor is only going to increase the price of your STI while limiting the pressure on Subaru to produce a better car. However, don’t just throw the Evo out because they don’t have an explicit colour scheme. Even stock these cars give you the satisfaction that you’re driving a brilliantly quick car. Our product picks are editor-tested, expert-approved. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and the Subaru WRX STI have been competitors, red in tooth and claw, for more than a dozen years in the U.S., … In fact, you’ll feel more of the road, and it unknowingly makes the beginner driver improve more quickly. The Evo's 6-speed manual transmission (MR only) is crisp and precise, making missed shifts rare. - … The Evo and the STI are better, in my opinion. No limited edition. A victor in this rivalry is not easily determined. You suddenly feel like an advocate of rude awakenings, with a mission to complete every time you strap into the driver's seat. What is more practical than a family car? Vintage Stig: Mitsubishi Evo 8 vs. Subaru WRX STI We're curing our Top Gear cravings with frequent spins through the YouTube archives. This hour, TED speakers explore how repairing the wrongs of … Owners of both brands should be, even considering brand loyalty, praising each other’s work. Here are my arguments for why it’s the Evo that’s in fact the better car: Sure, Subaru has been able to make a name for itself through Colin McRae, but he drove a heavily modified STI with all the best equipment and factory sponsorship. No special authenticated plaque. That may be so, but I have two points here that may make you look twice at the Evo instead. Just in case you haven’t stepped outside your Subaru bubble recently, Mitsubishi also has a hatchback. Nope. The Evo's 6-speed manual transmission (MR only) is crisp and precise, making missed shifts rare. The Sti has more important things that can't be upgraded on the EVO like .5 liters, boxer, ultra beefy 6 spd tranny,,,,, you know, the things that count! Road & Track participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites. There are new slant ed bulbous headlights and cleaner taillight clusters too. This article was written by freelance writer Kate Sickelka.